Do you know any recent
parents who say that acupuncture helped them conceive -- after years of trying
to get pregnant? If you’re part of a growing population of Gen-X and Gen-Y who
has sought out methods to enhance fertility, then you probably do have a few
people in your social network who can attest to the powers of Traditional
Chinese Medicine for helping couples to conceive.
A growing number of
people trying acupuncture
in San Diego are requesting acupuncture treatment for fertility enhancement. Some are actually
using acupuncture as part of Western Medicine to help with the success of
in-vitro fertilization (IVF). There are reported success rates of up to 70% for
acupuncture assistance with IVF, which is greater than the success rate of IVF
alone.
There was a scientific
meta-analysis of the usefulness of acupuncture for IVF success, which was
published in the Oxford Journal in 2013, and the conclusion of the large
study was that acupuncture was not effective. The study’s authors actually said
that acupuncture decreased the chances of IVF being successful. This was an
alarming conclusion for many patients who had achieved success with
acupuncture. Clinicians had witnessed great success using acupuncture in their
IVF clinics. So why the discrepancy? It turns out that this study was funded by
a drug company that makes fertility drugs and anti-depressants!
This is one reason why
it’s so important to look at the source of anything you read nowadays, whether
it’s a news-related article, magazine article, or scientific journal. Everyone
has their own bias, and it’s impossible to be completely neutral when writing
anything, but consumers should still be aware of the source and potential
biases. Who do you trust the most? Your best friend who just got pregnant
because of acupuncture? Or a scientist working for a drug company, who has a
vested interest in “proving” that acupuncture doesn’t work?
Some acupuncture for
fertility studies compare “true” acupuncture with “sham” acupuncture. Sham
acupuncture often involves the use of special fake acupuncture needles that are
placed at the acupuncture points and appear to get shorter as they’re
“inserted” into the body. They don’t stimulate the acupoints in the same way as
an actual needle that penetrates the epidermal layer of the skin. Many studies
show that even the sham acupuncture enhances fertility and the success rates of
IVF. Many suspect that the reason for this is that the acupuncture point is
stimulated regardless of whether the needle actually penetrates the skin or
not. In fact, some modalities of Japanese acupuncture actually use the non-insertion
technique, in which acupuncture needles are held on the acupuncture points, but
not inserted. Therefore, “sham” acupuncture is not really a sham. Some patients
-- especially those who may have a deficiency condition -- may even do better
with the “sham” or non-insertion technique. Ask your acupuncturist in San
Diego about Japanese
acupuncture or the non-insertion technique if you are needle-sensitive or
deficient.
ineffective for a particular condition, this is synonymous to saying
that Western Medicine is ineffective if aspirin fails to treat H.pylori
infection (stomach ulcers). Obviously some antibiotics can treat H. pylori, but
aspirin does not. No researcher or doctor would discount the effectiveness of
antibiotics -- or Western Medicine as a whole -- simply because aspirin does
not treat H. pylori (and may even exacerbate a stomach ulcer).